Needs Assessment for Ergonomic Patient Repositioning Device Among Bedridden Patients: A Literature Review

Authors

  • Irma Darmawati Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Agni Laili Perdani Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Ridha Wahdini Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Nadia Sintia Wardany Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33755/jkk.v12i2.1017

Keywords:

Caregivers, Immobilization, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Pressure Ulcer, Self-Help Devices

Abstract

Background: Pressure ulcers remain a prevalent and preventable complication among bedridden patients, with manual repositioning every two hours established as the clinical standard of prevention. This practice places substantial physical demands on nurses and informal caregivers, contributing to high rates of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, including low back pain, among those performing repetitive turning tasks. Despite the availability of various assistive devices, most have been developed without systematic assessment of the combined needs of both patients and caregivers as dual users. Objective:

This review aimed to identify clinical, ergonomic, and functional needs for a patient repositioning device among bedridden patients and their caregivers through synthesis of existing literature. Methods: A literature review was conducted using Scopus, PubMed, and EBSCO, covering publications from 2016 to 2024. Articles published in English addressing repositioning practices, assistive device design or evaluation, caregiver ergonomics, or pressure injury prevention in immobile patients were included. Studies unrelated to repositioning function or device ergonomics were excluded. Eight articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final synthesis. Results: Three primary need domains were consistently identified across the reviewed literature. First, bedridden patients require effective pressure redistribution to prevent tissue injury during prolonged immobility. Second, caregivers need a reduction in biomechanical workload during repositioning, particularly in lumbar and shoulder loading. Third, the device must offer usability features that enable safe, consistent positioning without requiring multiple personnel or specialized training. Current assistive devices inadequately address all three domains simultaneously, with most designs optimizing for one dimension at the expense of others. Conclusion: Bedridden patients and their caregivers present distinct yet interdependent needs that must be jointly addressed in ergonomic repositioning device development. A dual-user design framework integrating pressure redistribution, biomechanical efficiency, and practical usability represents a critical direction for future nursing research and device innovation.

References

1. Nixon J, Brown S, Smith IL, McGinnis E, Vargas-Palacios A, Nelson EA, et al. Comparing alternating pressure mattresses and high-specification foam mattresses to prevent pressure ulcers in high-risk patients: the PRESSURE 2 RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2019;23(52):1-176.

2. Mansouri M, Krishnan G, McDonagh DC, Zallek CM, Hsiao-Wecksler ET. Review of assistive devices for the prevention of pressure ulcers: an engineering perspective. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024;19(4):1511-1530.

3. Boyle CJ, Carpanen D, Pandelani T, Higgins CA, Masen MA, Masouros SD. Lateral pressure equalisation as a principle for designing support surfaces to prevent deep tissue pressure ulcers. PLoS One. 2020;15(1):e0227064.

4. Powers J. Two methods for turning and positioning and the effect on pressure ulcer development: a comparison cohort study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2016;43(1):46-50.

5. Apriliyasari RW, Hasan F, Purwandari NP, Putri DS. Prevalence and associated factors of depression among Indonesian elderly with stroke: finding from a nationwide study. J Integr Health Res. 2025;1(1):26-32.

6. Yunding J, Saleh LM, Tahir T, Wahyu A, Sidin AI, Arsyad M, et al. Stroke caregiving in Asia: a scoping review of caregiver burden. Dialogues Health. 2026;100281.

7. Abdul Halim NS, Mohd Ripin Z, Ridzwan MIZ. Effects of patient transfer devices on the risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2023;29(2):494-514.

8. Weiner C, Alperovitch-Najenson D, Ribak J, Kalichman L. Prevention of nurses' work-related musculoskeletal disorders resulting from repositioning patients in bed: comprehensive narrative review. Workplace Health Saf. 2015;63(5):226-232.

9. Fray M, Davis KG. Effectiveness of safe patient handling equipment and techniques: a review of biomechanical studies. Hum Factors. 2024;66(3):553-577.

10. Kapp S, Gerdtz M, Gefen A, Prematunga R, Santamaria N. An observational study of the maintenance of the 30° side-lying lateral tilt position among aged care residents at risk of developing pressure injuries when using the standard care pillow and a purpose-designed positioning device. Int Wound J. 2019;16(5):1080-1086.

11. Sousa I, Kapp S, Santamaria N. Positioning immobile critically ill patients who are at risk of pressure injuries using a purpose-designed positioning device and usual care equipment: an observational feasibility study. Int Wound J. 2020;17(4):1028-1038.

12. Itakura DA, Nakato AM, Hembecker PK, Neves EB, Nohama P. Thermal changes in the sacral region with different mattresses used in the prevention of pressure injuries. J Therm Biol. 2022;110:103366.

13. Xiao Y, Liu T, Meng C, Jiao ZA, Meng F, Guo S. Modeling and comfort analysis of arrayed air cushion mattress for pressure ulcer prevention and assisted repositioning. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2024;41(1):160-167.

14. Gillespie BM, Walker RM, Latimer SL, Thalib L, Whitty JA, McInnes E, et al. Repositioning for pressure injury prevention in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;6(6):CD009958.

15. Iblasi AS, Aungsuroch Y, Gunawan J, Juanamasta IG, Carver C. Repositioning practice of bedridden patients: an evolutionary concept analysis. SAGE Open Nurs. 2022;8:23779608221106443.

16. Omura Y, Watanabe A, Shibata K, Inoue T. Evaluation of repositioning care provided by non-professionals using a caregiver-assistive device: an experimental study. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):21108.

17. Noble NL, Sweeney NL. Barriers to the use of assistive devices in patient handling. Workplace Health Saf. 2018;66(1):41-48.

18. Mamom J, Daovisan H. Listening to caregivers' voices: the informal family caregiver burden of caring for chronically ill bedridden elderly patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(1):567.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Darmawati, I., Perdani, A. L., Wahdini, R., & Wardany, N. S. (2026). Needs Assessment for Ergonomic Patient Repositioning Device Among Bedridden Patients: A Literature Review. Jurnal Keperawatan Komprehensif (Comprehensive Nursing Journal), 12(2), 348–357. https://doi.org/10.33755/jkk.v12i2.1017